| |
|
 |
Residential Information and Controls Technology Review.February 2010.
Descriptions, pictures, and links for home energy displays and automation systems from 48 vendors. |
|
|
 |
An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing
of electricity. Energy, 2007.
Hourly load data collected during a 15-month experiment shows statistically significant load reduction during events, for participants both with and without automated end-use control technologies. Response is greatest on days with maximum temperatures above 95°F, but good response is also found ondays with maximum temperatures below 60°F. |
|
|
 |
Residential Implementation of Critical-Peak Pricing of Electricity. Energy Policy, 2007.
Findings show that high-use customers respond significantly more in kW reduction than do low-use customers, while low-use customers save significantly more in percentage reduction of annual electricity bills than do high-use customers—results that challenge the strategy of targeting only high-use customers for CPP tariffs. Across income levels, average load and bill changes were statistically indistinguishable, as were satisfaction rates. |
|
|
 |
Residential Response to Critical Peak Pricing of Electricity: California Evidence. Energy, 2010.
Results show that larger users respond more in both absolute and percentage terms, and customers in the coolest climate zone respond most as a percentage of their baseline load. Finally, an analysis involving the two different levels of critical-peak prices – $0.50/kWh and $0.68/kWh – indicates that households did not respond more to the higher CPP rate. |
|
|
|
Small Commercial Research |
|
|
 |
A Successful Case Study of Small Business Energy Efficiency and Demand Response with Communicating Thermostats. August 2009.
SMUD’s “Small Business Summer Solutions” pilot provided on-site energy efficiency advice and offered participants several program options, including the choice of either a dynamic rate or monthly payment for air-conditioning setpoint control. During the summer, participants had energy savings of 20%, and the potential for an additional 14% to 20% load drop during a 100°F demand response event. In addition to the efficiency-related bill savings, participants on the dynamic rate saved an estimated 5% on their energy costs compared to the standard rate. |
|
|
 |
Small Business Demand Response with Communicating Thermostats: SMUD’s Summer Solutions Research Pilot. September 2009.
This is the complete report describing SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Study (151 pages). |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
 |
Unlocking the Potential for Efficiency and Demand Response through Advanced Metering. LBNL-55673. August 2004. |
| |
|
 |
Feasibility of Implementing Dynamic Pricing in California. CEC-400-03-020F. October 2003. |
| |
|
 |
Rates and Technologies for Mass Market Demand Response. LBNL-50626. August 2002. |
| |
|
 |
Things That Go Blip in the Night: Standby Power and How to Limit It. ISBN 92-64-18557-7. 2001. |
| |
|
 |
Energy Consumption of Set-top Boxes and Telephony Products in the U.S. LBNL-45305. June 2001. |
| |
|
 |
Energy Use of U.S. Consumer Electronics at the end of the 20th Century. LBNL-46212. September 2000. |
| |
|
 |
Energy Use of Home Audio Products in the U.S. LBNL-43468. December 1999. |
| |
|
 |
Wind Energy Potential of Coastal Eritrea: an Analysis of Sparse Wind Data. Solar Energy, 1999. |
| |
|